Hurricane

How can cyclones be improved?
Near 350 projects implemented in the past 12 years, helped ACS develop a complete line of very different Hurricane cyclone families, with each family responding to a particular need from the client and considering how inter-particle agglomeration / clustering affects collection efficiency. From coarse particle pre-separation proportioned by compact and low pressure drop cyclones, such as the SD and DX, to fine particulate capture with high-end geometries such as the EX and MK, ACS provides solutions for a wide range of industrial cases, being able to reach emissions comparable to ESPs (down to less than 30mg/Nm³).
 
Particle Agglomeration and Numerical Optimization
ACS research team has been investigating this phenomenon since its foundation. Several related technical and scientific articles were published, among which the “Impact of particle agglomeration in cyclones” (Chemical Engineering Journal 162 (2010) 861–876)”. This knowledge has helped ACS build very accurate models of efficiency prediction, capable of explaining why sub-micrometer particles are often captured with much higher efficiency than expected. Indeed, particles tend to form bigger agglomerates (clusters) much easier to collect than the original particles. Agglomeration increases in the presence of wide particle size distributions, long residence times in the cyclone and high inlet particle concentrations. This knowledge has been incorporated in ACS numerical simulation tool, combining a sophisticated stochastic algorithm with a classical numerical model to predict cyclone performance: the PACyc (Particle Agglomeration in Cyclones) model.
 
Creating multiple cyclones for multiple needs
Thanks to the PACyc Model, and considering several economic and operation constraints (such as size and pressure loss), it is possible to simulate millions of virtual prototypes with numerical optimization within an affordable period. Considering this approach as the best path to obtain truly optimized cyclones, sound theories of cyclone collection and pressure loss were chosen for each process application. These numerical optimization problems have resulted in several families of cyclones, some of those patented. Indeed, different industrial cases have different needs for which the optimization functions to incorporate in the PACyc model may be as complex as minimizing cost or space, subject to a minimum efficiency result.
The following cyclone families, always subject to further customization, are the result of very different client demands ACS has come across until now.
 

How do cyclones compare?
The best way to understand the purpose of each type of cyclone and how they differentiate from each other is by designing arrangements by cyclone type for a given industrial example.

Depending on the requirements of the client, ACS may design solutions that go from process cyclones or compact pre-separators for sparks and silica reduction (protection of downstream equipment) to a final stage dust collector. The more efficient the solution is, the larger the number of cyclones needed to increase residence time and promote particle agglomeration with impact of space and cost. ACS will always search for the most cost-efficient solution.
 
Please compare the performance of several products below for emissions control in a 5MW^th wood chips moving grate boiler. Each cyclone solution has the same pressure drop and is treating air and particles coming directly from the boiler.

Example of: 4MWth biomass boiler. Range of emissions figures depend on the type of cyclone family used